Satirical Piece: Supreme Court Upholds Retroactive 'Temporal Gerrymander' Altering 1932 Election
By
The Onion Staff
Summary
The article is a satirical piece reporting on a fictional Supreme Court ruling that upholds a "temporal gerrymander" — the ability to redraw historical congressional maps retroactively. The ruling, described as 6-3 along conservative lines, would allow the Republican National Committee to alter the outcome of the 1932 House elections, costing Democrats control and giving the GOP a supermajority. The satire uses absurdist legal reasoning to critique contemporary gerrymandering and the politicization of the judiciary.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledIn a wide-reaching decision likely to affect every era of American life, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling Tuesday upholding a temporal gerrymander that would cost Democrats control of the House of Representatives in the 1932 election.
With the 6-3 judgment, the court's conservative majority permitted the Republican National Committee to redraw congressional maps from the nation's past, an aggressive strategy designed to split space and time heavily in the party's favor.
The new districts in the historic 1932 race are expected to give the GOP a supermajority in the
You might also wanna read
Democrats plan redistricting push in seven blue states to counter GOP gerrymandering for 2028 elections
Following the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais ruling that weakened the Voting Rights Act, Republicans have been rapidly passing gerryma
Folha editorial: Republican gerrymandering manipulates US House district voting system
This editorial from Folha de S.Paulo analyzes how the U.S. House of Representatives electoral system, based on single-member districts, is b
Redistricting and the Supreme Court have cut voters out of US House races
Louisiana lawmakers approve new congressional map favoring Republicans after Supreme Court ruling
Louisiana lawmakers passed a new congressional map designed to give Republicans a 5-1 seat advantage, following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling
Supreme Court allows Alabama to use 2023 congressional map despite racial discrimination findings
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow Alabama to use its 2023 congressional map for an August special primary, reversing a lower court's
ohiocapitaljournal.com·24d agoDemocrats Condemn Southern GOP Efforts to Eliminate Black-Majority Districts After Supreme Court Ruling
The article examines the history of racism in America through Supreme Court decisions, contrasting landmark civil rights cases (Brown v. Boa

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.