Supreme Court strikes down post-Watergate limits on political party campaign spending in 6-3 ruling
By
Grady Martin
Summary
The Supreme Court struck down a 1974 post-Watergate law that limited how much political parties can spend on candidates, ruling 6-3 along ideological lines that the restrictions violate First Amendment rights. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion, stating that all political parties and candidates should be able to compete equally under the same rules. The decision further loosens campaign finance restrictions in the U.S.
Source
Key quotes
· 1 pulledWhether the Democratic Party, the Republican Party or other parties, all political parties and candidates going forward can compete equally under the same rules
You might also wanna read

Flawed SCOTUS Campaign Finance Ruling Opens New Avenues for Billionaires and Corporations to Buy Elections

Supreme Court Gives Blessing for Billionaires to Buy More Influence Over Politicians

Corporate Political Spending Surges to Record-Shattering Levels
US Supreme Court Limits Lower-Court Orders Blocking Trump's Ban on Birthright Citizenship
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of limiting lower-court orders that blocked Trump's administration's ban on birthright citizenship,
Supreme Court Rules 6-3 That Everyone Is a Critic
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that everyone is a critic, emphasizing the prevalence of opinions on the court's operations.
Satirical Supreme Court Ruling Mocks Originalist Arguments On Trans Athlete Bans
A satirical article from The Onion reporting that the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling upholding state bans on transgender athletes, c

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.