All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Supreme Court Rules 7-2 That Federal Approval Preempts State Cancer-Warning Lawsuits Against Bayer Over Roundup

By

Greg Stohr

5d ago· 1 min readenNews

Summary

The US Supreme Court ruled 7-2 to shield Bayer AG from tens of thousands of lawsuits claiming its Roundup herbicide should carry a cancer warning. The justices threw out a $1.25 million jury verdict won by a Missouri man with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ruling that federal regulators' conclusion that no warning was needed preempts state-level failure-to-warn claims. The decision helps end a decade-long litigation wave that has cost Bayer over $10 billion.

Source

bskySupreme Court Rules 7-2 That Federal Approval Preempts State Cancer-Warning Lawsuits Against Bayer Over Roundupbloomberg.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The US Supreme Court shielded Bayer AG from tens of thousands of claims that its Roundup herbicide should have been labeled as a cancer risk
Voting 7-2, the justices threw out a $1.25 million jury verdict won by a Missouri man who blamed Roundup for his non-Hodgkin lymphoma
The majority said consumers can't sue Bayer for the absence of a cancer warning given that federal regulators concluded a cautionary statement wasn't necessary
Snippet from the RSS feed
The US Supreme Court shielded Bayer AG from tens of thousands of claims that its Roundup herbicide should have been labeled as a cancer risk in a ruling that will help end a decade-long flood of lawsuits that have cost the company more than $10 billion.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.