All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Why I choose passwords over biometric authentication for phone security

By

Saeed Wazir

2h ago· 6 min readenOpinion

Summary

The author explains why they refuse to use biometric authentication (fingerprint or Face ID) on their phones, arguing that these methods compromise privacy and security. They contend that biometric data is immutable and once compromised cannot be changed, unlike passwords. The author also raises concerns about how biometric data can be compelled by law enforcement (you can be forced to unlock a phone with your face/fingerprint but not to reveal a password), and how companies store and potentially share this sensitive data. They advocate for using strong alphanumeric passwords instead, prioritizing privacy over convenience.

Source

bskyWhy I choose passwords over biometric authentication for phone securitypocket-lint.com

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Biometric data is the one thing you cannot change if it gets compromised — unlike a password, you can't get a new face.
The Fifth Amendment protects you from being forced to reveal a password. It does not protect your fingerprint or your face.
Convenience should never come at the cost of your fundamental right to privacy.
Every time you use Face ID or a fingerprint scanner, you are handing over a piece of your biological identity to a machine that may not have your best interests at heart.
Snippet from the RSS feed
No compromise on privacy

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.