All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Why Game UX Design Prioritizes Joy and Friction Over Efficiency

By

Laia Tremosa

19d ago· 4 min readenInsight

Summary

This article explores how game UX design fundamentally differs from traditional UX by prioritizing joy and engagement over efficiency and productivity. It introduces concepts like intentional friction (deliberately slowing users down), meaningful challenge, and Celia Hodent's "engageability" framework — which includes usability, emotional engagement, and flow. The piece argues that while traditional UX removes obstacles to help users complete tasks quickly, game UX adds obstacles and friction to create satisfying, enjoyable experiences. Key principles include the paradox of failure (games make failure fun), progressive mastery, and designing for emotional highs and lows rather than smooth, frictionless experiences.

Source

Interaction Design FoundationWhy Game UX Design Prioritizes Joy and Friction Over Efficiencyixdf.org

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Designing not for productivity, but for joy.
Imagine telling a traditional UX designer that you're going to deliberately slow users down, add obstacles they don't need, and make things harder on purpose.
Games don't just remove friction — they create it, shape it, and turn it into the main ingredient of fun.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Discover how game UX design differs from traditional UX. Learn why intentional friction, challenge, and Celia Hodent's engageability framework are key to creating video games players love.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.