All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

The Two Kinds of Random: Why π Compresses and Noise Doesn't — and the Proof Barrier Between Them

By

pcael

3h ago· 22 min readenInsight

Summary

This article explores a deep puzzle in mathematics and information theory: two files of a million digits each — one pure random noise, the other the first million digits of π — are statistically identical (both pass randomness tests), yet one (π) can be compressed to a few lines while the other cannot. The author uses this gap to dissect the concept of 'compressible' into two distinct meanings: compressible in practice (algorithmic) versus compressible in theory (Kolmogorov complexity). The piece traces through randomness, entropy, statistical testing, and the philosophical wall that you can always prove something is compressible but can never prove it isn't — a boundary that touches on Gödel-like incompleteness and the limits of mathematical proof.

Source

Hacker NewsThe Two Kinds of Random: Why π Compresses and Noise Doesn't — and the Proof Barrier Between Themstillthinking.net

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Imagine two files, and each one holds a million digits. The first one is pure noise — imagine I rolled a ten-sided die a million times and wrote down the results. The second one is the first million digits of π.
you can always prove a thing can be compressed, but never that it can't.
Any errors, awkward sentences, and weird tangents are 100% organic, free-range, and human-made.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Two files of a million digits, statistically identical, and yet one compresses to three lines and the other never will. Chasing that gap splits the idea of 'compressible' into two very different things — and leads to a strange wall: you can always prove a

You might also wanna read

Mathematicians Use Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems to Develop New Cryptographic Tool

This article explores the intersection of mathematical unknowability (inspired by Gödel's incompleteness theorems) and modern cryptography.

ow.ly·1mo ago

Quantum Jamming and Causality: The Search for Post-Quantum Cryptography

The article discusses how quantum computers pose a threat to current encryption methods, and how cryptographers are responding by developing

wired.com·28d ago

Limitations and improvements of chain rules for conditional entropies in quantum cryptography security proofs

This article discusses chain rules for conditional entropies in quantum cryptography, which are essential for security proofs against genera

arxiv.org·1mo ago

NIST scientist uses Gödel's incompleteness theorems to prove AI systems cannot be made fully secure

A NIST senior scientist, Apostol Vassilev, has published a peer-reviewed paper in IEEE Security and Privacy using Gödel's incompleteness the

nist.gov·23d ago

Quantum state distinguishability in noisy scrambled ensembles exhibits phase-transition behavior

This research paper extends the concept of quantum state distinguishability from pairs of states to quantum state ensembles, characterized t

arxiv.org·1mo ago

Constrained de Finetti Reduction Simplifies Quantum Communication Compression Analysis

Researchers led by Louis Desruisseaux (CNRS) have developed a constrained de Finetti reduction that leverages information about input types

quantumzeitgeist.com·5d ago

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.