All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
First reported by Hacker News
US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require Fourth Amendment privacy protections

Supreme Court rules police need warrants for cellphone location data under Fourth Amendment

By

By: Jonathan Shorman - June 29, 2026 12:05 pm

3h ago· 5 min readenNews

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that law enforcement searches for cellphone location history near crime scenes are covered by the Fourth Amendment, requiring warrants to obtain such data. However, the Court left unresolved the question of when such searches are constitutionally reasonable, suggesting the justices will need to revisit digital privacy rights in future cases.

Source

bskySupreme Court rules police need warrants for cellphone location data under Fourth Amendmentohiocapitaljournal.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that law enforcement searches for the location history of cellphones near crime scenes are covered by the Fourth Amendment, requiring warrants to obtain the data.
But the high court left unsettled when searches for the information are reasonable — likely meaning the justices will eventually weigh in again on the privacy rights of Americans in the electronic era.
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that police officers conducted a search for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment when they obtained cellphone location history data
Snippet from the RSS feed
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that law enforcement searches for the location history of cellphones near crime scenes are covered by the Fourth Amendment, requiring warrants to obtain the data. But the high court left unsettled when searches for the

You might also wanna read

US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require Fourth Amendment privacy protections

The US Supreme Court has ruled that geofence warrants — which compel tech companies to provide location data for all devices within a geogra

theguardian.com·1d ago

Michigan Supreme Court Limits Police Phone Searches, Requires Specific Warrants for Digital Devices

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that police cannot use overly broad warrants to search digital devices without specific limitations. In Peo

reclaimthenet.org·10mo ago

Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Geofence Warrants in Bank Robbery Case

The article reports on the Supreme Court's review of geofence warrants, focusing on the case of Okello T. Chatrie, who was convicted of a 20

The New York Times·2mo ago

Supreme Court's Chatrie Case Challenges Third-Party Doctrine on Geofence Warrants and Location Data

The Supreme Court's decision in Chatrie vs US brings renewed scrutiny to the third-party doctrine as applied to geofence warrants and modern

luma.com·6h ago

Tenth Circuit Court Rules Broad Search Warrants for Protesters' Devices Violate Fourth Amendment

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court's dismissal of a challenge to broad search warrants targeting protesters' device

eff.org·4mo ago

Federal Court Rules Verizon's Sale of Customer Location Data Without Consent Is Illegal

A federal court rejected Verizon's argument that selling customer location data without consent is legal. The court found that Verizon large

arstechnica.com·9mo ago

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.