Supreme Court rules police need warrants for cellphone location data under Fourth Amendment
By
By: Jonathan Shorman - June 29, 2026 12:05 pm
Summary
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that law enforcement searches for cellphone location history near crime scenes are covered by the Fourth Amendment, requiring warrants to obtain such data. However, the Court left unresolved the question of when such searches are constitutionally reasonable, suggesting the justices will need to revisit digital privacy rights in future cases.
Source

bskySupreme Court rules police need warrants for cellphone location data under Fourth Amendmentohiocapitaljournal.comKey quotes
· 3 pulledThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that law enforcement searches for the location history of cellphones near crime scenes are covered by the Fourth Amendment, requiring warrants to obtain the data.
But the high court left unsettled when searches for the information are reasonable — likely meaning the justices will eventually weigh in again on the privacy rights of Americans in the electronic era.
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that police officers conducted a search for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment when they obtained cellphone location history data
You might also wanna read

US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require Fourth Amendment privacy protections
The US Supreme Court has ruled that geofence warrants — which compel tech companies to provide location data for all devices within a geogra

Michigan Supreme Court Limits Police Phone Searches, Requires Specific Warrants for Digital Devices
The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that police cannot use overly broad warrants to search digital devices without specific limitations. In Peo
Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Geofence Warrants in Bank Robbery Case
The article reports on the Supreme Court's review of geofence warrants, focusing on the case of Okello T. Chatrie, who was convicted of a 20
Supreme Court's Chatrie Case Challenges Third-Party Doctrine on Geofence Warrants and Location Data
The Supreme Court's decision in Chatrie vs US brings renewed scrutiny to the third-party doctrine as applied to geofence warrants and modern
Tenth Circuit Court Rules Broad Search Warrants for Protesters' Devices Violate Fourth Amendment
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court's dismissal of a challenge to broad search warrants targeting protesters' device
Federal Court Rules Verizon's Sale of Customer Location Data Without Consent Is Illegal
A federal court rejected Verizon's argument that selling customer location data without consent is legal. The court found that Verizon large
arstechnica.com·9mo ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.