Unit Testing Fraud: Why Code Coverage is a Lie
From the article
The coverage report can be helpful in identifying untested code, but targeting a percentage of coverage does not equal quality-tested code.
Continue reading on daily.devYou might also wanna read
Challenges in Collecting Code Coverage from Blackbox Binaries During Fuzz Testing
This article discusses the evolution of fuzz testing, specifically focusing on the challenges and techniques for collecting code coverage fr
redvice.org·3d ago
AI-Assisted Development Demands a Rethink of Testing Strategy, Not Just Test Automation
The article explores the strategic decision teams face after merging AI-assisted code: whether to add traditional browser tests, use AI tool
dev.to·1mo agoDebunking the Myth of Automated Code Generation: An April Fools' Joke
The article humorously debunks the idea of a tool that could write code for developers, labeling it as an April Fools' joke. It sarcasticall
Ask HN: Distinguishing intentional test boilerplate from real code duplication in duplicate-code detectors
A maintainer of a deterministic open-source duplicate-code detector discusses a challenging feature request: how to distinguish intentional
Dev-Owned Testing: Why It Fails in Practice and Succeeds in Theory
dl.acm.org·5mo ago
Writing Robust Code: Reducing Assumptions and Handling Real-World Imperfections
A programming-focused article discussing the importance of reducing assumptions in code by handling edge cases, errors, and imperfect real-w

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.