Ask HN: Distinguishing intentional test boilerplate from real code duplication in duplicate-code detectors
By
rafaepta
Summary
A maintainer of a deterministic open-source duplicate-code detector discusses a challenging feature request: how to distinguish intentional test boilerplate (repetitive test setups) from actual code duplication that should be refactored. The core problem is that tests deliberately repeat scenarios, which structural detectors flag as duplication, but users don't want to delete these repetitions. The maintainer considers a human-in-the-loop approach as a potential solution but lacks a clear implementation path.
Source
Key quotes
· 4 pulledTests repeat the same scenario. For a structural detector, this flags as repetition (duplication).
However, tests are not something people want to delete from the codebases.
The repetitions from tests (on purpose) end up looking like undesired code duplication and the tools cannot tell which is which.
One way to solve this would be something like a human in the loop (kind of how l
You might also wanna read
Turning Duplicate Bug Reports Into Critical Exploit Chains: A Bug Bounty Strategy Guide
This article discusses how bug bounty hunters can turn rejected "Duplicate" bug reports into opportunities by chaining multiple low-severity
undercodetesting.com·17d ago
Bun v0.6.6
AI-Assisted Development Demands a Rethink of Testing Strategy, Not Just Test Automation
The article explores the strategic decision teams face after merging AI-assisted code: whether to add traditional browser tests, use AI tool
dev.to·1mo agoLLMs Detect Vulnerabilities by Recognizing Safe Code Patterns, Not Vulnerable Ones, Study Finds
This research paper uses mechanistic interpretability to analyze how LLMs (specifically Gemma-2-2b) detect software vulnerabilities in C/C++
Duplicate Transaction Checker variable for Google Tag Manager server container
Dual-Layer Testing Framework for AI-Infused Applications: Combining Deterministic and Probabilistic Quality Assurance
AI-infused applications that embed large language models, agents, RAG, and tool-calling workflows combine deterministic code with probabilis

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.