All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

The hypocrisy of free speech champions on Palestine: Mehdi Hasan's critique

By

Mehdi Hasan

15d ago· 6 min readenOpinion

Summary

Mehdi Hasan argues that Western politicians and intellectuals who long championed free speech as a sacred liberal value have abandoned that principle when it comes to criticism of Israel and the issue of Palestine. The article highlights the hypocrisy of those who invoked Voltaire, Orwell, and the "Je suis Charlie" movement defending the right to offend, yet now seek to suppress speech about Gaza and Palestinian rights. Hasan contends that the Palestine issue has become the litmus test exposing the selective and conditional nature of free speech in Western liberal democracies.

Source

bskyThe hypocrisy of free speech champions on Palestine: Mehdi Hasan's critiquetheguardian.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The great irony of our age is that many of the cadre of politicians who spent years anointing themselves as champions of free speech have become its most enthusiastic enemies when the subject turns to one issue: Palestine.
For decades, western governments lectured the world about liberal values. They declared freedom of expression the hallmark of a liberal democratic society. Protest was deemed patriotic while the right to offend was considered sacred. Then came Gaza.
It was once an article of faith that even those who speak words we disagree with deserve protection. As regards Palestine, that's now not true.
Snippet from the RSS feed
It was once an article of faith that even those who speak words we disagree with deserve protection. As regards Palestine, that’s now not true, says Mehdi Hasan, editor-in-chief and CEO of Zeteo

You might also wanna read

Analysis: How Political Figures Weaponize Debate Demands to Manipulate Public Discourse

The article critiques the "debate me bro" tactic used by political figures like Charlie Kirk, arguing that it's a disingenuous grift rather

techdirt.com·9mo ago

Critique of Scott Aaronson's Defense of Zionism Using Trolley Problem Analogy for Gaza Conflict

The article criticizes Scott Aaronson's recent blog post where he uses a philosophical analogy to defend Zionism in the context of the Gaza

math.columbia.edu·9mo ago

Academics Criticize Censorship of Ukraine War Discussion on Forced Mobilization

The article is a response from five academics whose panel discussion on gender, resistance, and forced mobilization in Ukraine and ex-Yugosl

newglobalpolitics.org·6mo ago

Global Crackdown on Political Satire: From Egypt to the US, Comedians Face Increasing Intolerance

The article examines how political satire and comedy are being suppressed globally, drawing parallels between Donald Trump's attacks on Amer

theguardian.com·9mo ago

Critical Review: Franco Berardi's 'Thinking Gaza' Lacks Material Engagement with Palestinian Reality

This article is a critical analysis and review of Franco Berardi's book 'Thinking Gaza.' The author argues that Berardi's philosophical appr

Defector·1mo ago

Civil liberties groups warn AHPRA antisemitism definition could chill free speech and protest rights

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) is facing backlash from civil liberties groups and over 1,500 healthcare worker

theage.com.au·1d ago

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.