All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Academics Criticize Censorship of Ukraine War Discussion on Forced Mobilization

By

hackandthink

5mo ago· 10 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article is a response from five academics whose panel discussion on gender, resistance, and forced mobilization in Ukraine and ex-Yugoslavia was suspended by the Review of Democracy journal. The authors argue that this cancellation represents a troubling erosion of academic freedom and open debate in Western academia, particularly regarding discussions about the war in Ukraine. They critique how liberal institutions are censoring critical perspectives on forced mobilization, framing it as part of a broader pattern where certain viewpoints on Ukraine are being suppressed under the guise of 'safety' or political alignment.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
This case illustrates how academic freedom and open debate are eroding in Western academia
The suspension of our event demonstrates how certain topics related to Ukraine have become taboo
Liberal institutions are increasingly censoring critical perspectives on forced mobilization under the guise of political alignment
Academic freedom requires the ability to discuss difficult topics, even during wartime
The suppression of our panel reflects broader patterns of censorship in discussions about Ukraine
Snippet from the RSS feed
Why are liberal institutions censoring discussion of forced mobilization in Ukraine?

You might also wanna read