The Failure of Professional Skepticism: A Critique of Leading Skeptics
By
mathgenius
Pure flour-power. Hearty enough to carry you through lunch.
Summary
The article critiques the lack of professional skepticism among leading skeptics, using literary references and historical context to highlight the issue. It emphasizes the need for extraordinary evidence in skepticism and challenges the intellectual vacuity of pseudo-skepticism.
Key quotes
· 3 pulled'You may be an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese.'
'’Tis safer to be that which we destroy, Than by destruction dwell in doubtful joy.'
'Leading skeptics fail the test of extraordinary evidence.'
You might also wanna read
Cultivating Intellectual Virtues as an Antidote to Post-Truth Challenges
Philosopher Jason Baehr argues that in our 'post-truth' era where competing perspectives and misinformation abound, knowledge has become a s

Teaching AI literacy: Why educators should focus on critical thinking, not tool usage
An educator describes a classroom exercise where students used generative AI to redesign a Moroccan road safety campaign. While students qui
The Limits of Boolean Thinking: How Binary Questions Constrain Our Worldview
This essay critiques "boolean thinking" — the forced binary (yes/no) pattern of thought imposed by yes/no questions. The author argues that
The Conceptual Confusion Between Money and Physical Objects
This article explores the conceptual conflation between money and physical objects/things. It examines how we often treat monetary value as

The Philosophical Mystery of Consciousness: Why Physical Brain States Produce Subjective Experience
The article explores the philosophical mystery of consciousness, examining why physical brain states are associated with subjective experien
Opinion: AI reliance may erode critical thinking and learning skills
A passionate opinion piece arguing against the common claim that non-AI users will be left behind. The author contends the opposite: those w
