The Challenge of Reproducible LLM Inference: Why Even Greedy Sampling Isn't Deterministic
By
jxmorris12
Toasted golden, schmeared with insight. Top of the rack.
Summary
The article discusses the challenge of achieving reproducible results in Large Language Model (LLM) inference. Even when using greedy sampling (temperature=0), which should theoretically be deterministic, LLM APIs and inference libraries still produce non-deterministic outputs due to factors like hardware differences, software implementations, and parallel processing. The article explores the technical reasons behind this nondeterminism and potential solutions for making LLM inference truly reproducible.
Key quotes
· 3 pulledReproducibility is a bedrock of scientific progress. However, it's remarkably difficult to get reproducible results out of large language models.
Even when we adjust the temperature down to 0 (thus making the sampling theoretically deterministic), LLM APIs are still not deterministic in practice.
Even when running inference on your own hardware with an OSS inference library like vLLM or SGLang, sampling still isn't deterministic.
You might also wanna read
RTP-LLM: Alibaba's High-Performance Inference Engine for Large Language Model Deployment
This paper presents RTP-LLM, a high-performance inference engine developed by Alibaba for industrial-scale deployment of Large Language Mode
Study finds LLMs persist in treating false claims as true despite explicit warnings
A study on fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) reveals that even after explicit warnings that certain claims are false, the models cont
arstechnica.com·1d ago