All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
First reported by Twitter / X
Supreme Court's Chatrie Case Challenges Third-Party Doctrine on Geofence Warrants and Location Data

Supreme Court rules 6-3 that Fourth Amendment protects phone location history data

By

Will Sattelberg

1d ago· 3 min readenNews

Summary

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Chatrie v. United States that the Fourth Amendment protects individuals' location history data collected by tech companies like Google and Apple, requiring police to obtain a warrant before accessing such data. The decision extends privacy protections to data voluntarily supplied to tech companies, marking a significant win for digital privacy rights.

Source

bskySupreme Court rules 6-3 that Fourth Amendment protects phone location history data9to5google.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
the ruling actually fell in the general public's favor
allowing and extending Fourth Amendment protections even to data willfully supplied to tech companies like Google and Apple
thus requiring police officers [to obtain a warrant]
Snippet from the RSS feed
The Supreme Court rendered a decision this morning on a case debating whether or not people have an “expectation of...

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.