Supreme Court rules Fourth Amendment privacy protections apply to cellphone location history data
By
Mark Sherman
Summary
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that constitutional privacy protections under the Fourth Amendment extend to cellphone location data obtained through geofence warrants. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the majority opinion, holding that individuals do not forfeit their reasonable expectation of privacy simply by opting into Google's location history services. The case involved a Virginia bank robber whose identity was uncovered via a geofence warrant. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, arguing the defendant voluntarily surrendered his location information to Google. The ruling represents the court's ongoing effort to apply 18th-century constitutional principles to modern digital technology.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledJustice Elena Kagan wrote for the 6-3 court that people don't forfeit expectations of privacy even when they opt into Google's location history.
Justice Samuel Alito wrote in dissent that the Virginia man at the center of the case had no expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turned over to Google.
The decision is the court's latest effort to apply a constitutional provision ratified in 1791 to technology the nation's founders could not have envisioned.
You might also wanna read

US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require Fourth Amendment privacy protections
The US Supreme Court has ruled that geofence warrants — which compel tech companies to provide location data for all devices within a geogra
Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Geofence Warrants in Bank Robbery Case
The article reports on the Supreme Court's review of geofence warrants, focusing on the case of Okello T. Chatrie, who was convicted of a 20

Michigan Supreme Court Limits Police Phone Searches, Requires Specific Warrants for Digital Devices
The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that police cannot use overly broad warrants to search digital devices without specific limitations. In Peo
Federal Court Rules Verizon's Sale of Customer Location Data Without Consent Is Illegal
A federal court rejected Verizon's argument that selling customer location data without consent is legal. The court found that Verizon large
arstechnica.com·9mo agoTenth Circuit Court Rules Broad Search Warrants for Protesters' Devices Violate Fourth Amendment
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court's dismissal of a challenge to broad search warrants targeting protesters' device
Government Agencies Buy Bulk Personal Data from Brokers Without Warrants, Bypassing Fourth Amendment Protections
The article exposes how data brokers collect vast amounts of personal information from cell phones and web browsers, then sell this data not

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.