All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
First reported by Hacker News
US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require Fourth Amendment privacy protections

Supreme Court rules Fourth Amendment privacy protections apply to cellphone location history data

By

Mark Sherman

3h ago· 3 min readenNews

Summary

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that constitutional privacy protections under the Fourth Amendment extend to cellphone location data obtained through geofence warrants. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the majority opinion, holding that individuals do not forfeit their reasonable expectation of privacy simply by opting into Google's location history services. The case involved a Virginia bank robber whose identity was uncovered via a geofence warrant. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, arguing the defendant voluntarily surrendered his location information to Google. The ruling represents the court's ongoing effort to apply 18th-century constitutional principles to modern digital technology.

Source

bskySupreme Court rules Fourth Amendment privacy protections apply to cellphone location history dataapnews.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the 6-3 court that people don't forfeit expectations of privacy even when they opt into Google's location history.
Justice Samuel Alito wrote in dissent that the Virginia man at the center of the case had no expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turned over to Google.
The decision is the court's latest effort to apply a constitutional provision ratified in 1791 to technology the nation's founders could not have envisioned.
Snippet from the RSS feed
The Supreme Court has held that constitutional privacy protections extend to cellphone location information, ruling in the case of a bank robber whose identity was discovered through a geofence warrant. Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the 6-3 court Monday t

You might also wanna read

US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require Fourth Amendment privacy protections

The US Supreme Court has ruled that geofence warrants — which compel tech companies to provide location data for all devices within a geogra

theguardian.com·22h ago

Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Geofence Warrants in Bank Robbery Case

The article reports on the Supreme Court's review of geofence warrants, focusing on the case of Okello T. Chatrie, who was convicted of a 20

The New York Times·2mo ago

Michigan Supreme Court Limits Police Phone Searches, Requires Specific Warrants for Digital Devices

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that police cannot use overly broad warrants to search digital devices without specific limitations. In Peo

reclaimthenet.org·10mo ago

Federal Court Rules Verizon's Sale of Customer Location Data Without Consent Is Illegal

A federal court rejected Verizon's argument that selling customer location data without consent is legal. The court found that Verizon large

arstechnica.com·9mo ago

Tenth Circuit Court Rules Broad Search Warrants for Protesters' Devices Violate Fourth Amendment

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court's dismissal of a challenge to broad search warrants targeting protesters' device

eff.org·4mo ago

Government Agencies Buy Bulk Personal Data from Brokers Without Warrants, Bypassing Fourth Amendment Protections

The article exposes how data brokers collect vast amounts of personal information from cell phones and web browsers, then sell this data not

npr.org·3mo ago

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.