Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Limits on Coordinated Party Spending with Candidates
By
Abbie VanSickle, Adam Liptak
Summary
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines to lift federal limits on how much political parties can spend on advertising and other expenses in coordination with candidates. The decision, which strikes down coordinated party expenditure limits as a violation of the First Amendment, is seen as a major victory for Republicans and could reduce one of the Democrats' financial advantages heading into the midterm elections. The case was brought by the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
Source
Key quotes
· 2 pulledThe 6-to-3 decision, divided along ideological lines, is a major victory for Republicans and could undercut one of the Democrats' financial advantages going into the midterm elections.
The question before the justices was whether current federal limits on such spending — called coordinated party expenditures — violate the First Amendment.
You might also wanna read
U.S. Supreme Court strikes down campaign finance restrictions on candidate coordination with parties

Flawed SCOTUS Campaign Finance Ruling Opens New Avenues for Billionaires and Corporations to Buy Elections

Supreme Court Gives Blessing for Billionaires to Buy More Influence Over Politicians

Corporate Political Spending Surges to Record-Shattering Levels
Satirical Piece: Supreme Court Upholds Retroactive 'Temporal Gerrymander' Altering 1932 Election
The article is a satirical piece reporting on a fictional Supreme Court ruling that upholds a "temporal gerrymander" — the ability to redraw
US Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Cut $2 Billion in NIH Research Grants
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing it to proceed with cutting nearly $2 billion in active researc

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.