All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

AI and Accessibility: Promise and Peril Require Responsible Development

By

Tom Shannon

· 10 min readenInsight

Summary

Aaron Gustafson, Microsoft's Accessibility Innovation Strategist, writes a nuanced piece on the intersection of AI and accessibility. While expressing skepticism about AI's potential for harm, he argues that AI can be a powerful tool for accessibility when developed responsibly. He emphasizes that AI's biases reflect the data and teams behind them, and calls for diverse, inclusive development teams to mitigate harm. The piece explores both the promises (e.g., assistive technologies, communication aids) and perils (e.g., bias, exclusion) of AI in accessibility, advocating for a human-centered, cautious approach to AI deployment.

Source

A List ApartAI and Accessibility: Promise and Peril Require Responsible Developmentalistapart.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
As with any tool, AI can be used in very constructive, inclusive, and accessible ways; and it can also be used in destructive, exclusive, and inaccessible ways.
The biases inherent in AI systems are a reflection of the data they are trained on and the people who build them.
We need diverse teams building these technologies to ensure they work for everyone, not just a privileged few.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Microsoft’s Accessibility Innovation Strategist discusses AI’s potential for accessibility, emphasizing the need for responsible use and diverse teams to mitigate harm and promote inclu…

You might also wanna read

AI Doesn't Fix Broken Accessibility — It Accelerates Existing Barriers, Microsoft Build Talk Argues

At Microsoft Build, Aaron Gustafson, Jessie Lorenz, and Carie Fisher presented a talk arguing that AI does not fix broken processes but acce

aaron-gustafson.com·17d ago

Why AI agents will force websites to prioritize accessibility

The article discusses how websites need to adapt for AI agents that will browse and interact with sites on behalf of users by 2026. It uses

uxdesign.cc·4d ago

Accessibility as an Operational Capability: Moving Beyond Compliance Checklists in Software Development

This article argues that digital accessibility should be treated as an operational capability embedded throughout the development lifecycle,

smashingmagazine.com·4d ago

Accessibility Becomes Central to Digital Innovation: A Review of Recent Global Developments

David Banes examines recent global developments showing that accessibility is transitioning from a niche concern to a core requirement of di

davebanesaccess.medium.com·11d ago

Accessibility Becomes Central to Digital Innovation: A Review of Recent Global Developments

David Banes examines recent global developments showing that accessibility is transitioning from a niche concern to a core requirement of di

davebanesaccess.medium.com·11d ago

AI Cannot Fix Broken Accessibility Systems — It Depends on Them, Says Anna E. Cook

Anna E. Cook argues that AI cannot fix accessibility problems in digital systems; instead, AI inherits and amplifies existing structural fla

annaecook.com·15d ago

Why Accessibility Must Be an Operational Capability, Not a Compliance Checklist

This article argues that digital accessibility should be treated as an operational capability embedded throughout the development lifecycle,

Smashing Magazine·6d ago

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.