All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

IBM pursues sequential transistor stacking for next-generation chip design, diverging from rivals

By

Samuel K. Moore

3h ago· 7 min readenNews

Summary

IBM has presented research at the IEEE VLSI Symposium detailing a different approach to next-generation transistor design. While all major chipmakers agree that future transistors will involve stacking two transistors vertically (complementary FET or CFET), IBM's path diverges from Intel, Samsung, and TSMC. IBM is pursuing a sequential stacking approach where the bottom transistor is built first, then the top transistor is fabricated on top using lower-temperature processes. This contrasts with the monolithic approach favored by others, where both transistors are built simultaneously. The sequential method offers advantages in design flexibility and thermal budget management but introduces challenges in alignment and defect control. Commercial introduction is expected around 2030.

Source

bskyIBM pursues sequential transistor stacking for next-generation chip design, diverging from rivalsspectrum.ieee.org

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Chipmakers agree that the transistor of the next decade will actually be two transistors stacked atop one another, packing in many more devices in the same area of silicon and leading to circuits that are as little as half the size of today's.
But their research efforts are beginning to show some important divergence in the details.
Commercial introduction is likely six years away, so they are far from a final version, but research presented last week at IEEE VLSI Symposium in Honolulu and detailed today by IBM points toward two main paths.
Snippet from the RSS feed
IBM chooses a different path from Intel, Samsung, and TSMC

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.