Supreme Court's 7-2 Decision Overturning Jury Award: A Rare Positive Ruling?
By
Rebecca Watson
Summary
The article discusses a recent 7-2 Supreme Court decision overturning a $1.25 million jury award to a Missouri man. The author frames this as a rare "good" Supreme Court ruling, contrasting it with other recent decisions they view negatively (church-state separation, women's rights, presidential immunity). The piece explores the nuances of the case and why this particular ruling, despite coming from a conservative-leaning court, may have a positive resulting effect.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledWe talk a lot about Supreme Court decisions, here, mostly about how horrible they are
But today I want to talk about a recent decision that is…good? Maybe? Sort of?
Okay, it has one positive resulting effect and that's better than all those previous rulings.
You might also wanna read
South Carolina Supreme Court Overturns Alex Murdaugh's Murder Convictions Over Jury Interference
South Carolina's Supreme Court has overturned Alex Murdaugh's 2023 murder convictions for killing his wife and son, ruling that he did not r
Satirical Piece: Supreme Court Upholds Retroactive 'Temporal Gerrymander' Altering 1932 Election
The article is a satirical piece reporting on a fictional Supreme Court ruling that upholds a "temporal gerrymander" — the ability to redraw
Supreme Court Overturns Humphrey's Executor, Expanding Presidential Power Over Federal Agencies
The Supreme Court overturned the 91-year-old Humphrey's Executor precedent in Trump v. Slaughter, ruling 6-3 that President Trump could fire
GPT-5 outperforms federal judges 100% to 52% in legal reasoning experiment
Examining courtroom decorum: When jokes, selfies, and cursing cross the line at the Supreme Court
The article discusses the appropriateness of informal behaviors—such as making jokes, taking selfies, and cursing—during Supreme Court oral


Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.