All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Supreme Court Rules Against Pesticide Warning Labels in Monsanto v. Durnell

5d ago· 5 min readen

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in Monsanto v. Durnell, siding with Monsanto (now Bayer) and eliminating the right of people to hold pesticide companies accountable for failing to warn consumers that their products may cause cancer. The decision preempts state-law failure-to-warn claims against pesticide manufacturers, dealing a blow to public health and consumer protections. The Center for Food Safety responded critically, vowing to continue the fight for accountability.

Source

bskySupreme Court Rules Against Pesticide Warning Labels in Monsanto v. Durnellcenterforfoodsafety.org

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The Court's majority sided with Monsanto (now Bayer) in holding that people who contract cancer from using a pesticide are preempted, or prohibited, from holding the company accountable for failing to warn them of the risk.
This decision eliminates the long-established right of people to hold pesticide companies accountable when they fail to warn consumers that their products may cause cancer or other diseases.
The fight is far from over.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Decision to Shield Pesticide Makers from

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.