All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Security
Security
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Debunking oxygenated water: Why the science doesn't hold up

This article critically examines the pseudoscience behind oxygenated water products, specifically debunking a recent study claiming an 'oxygen-nanobubble beverage' improves athletic performance by 2.4-7.1%. The author argues there is no plausible mechanism for such benefits and that the study suffers from methodological flaws. The piece serves as a skeptical analysis of marketing claims around oxygenated water, highlighting the lack of evidence and wishful thinking that drives these products.

Asker Jeukendrup and Nick Tiller1d ago7 min readenInsight
Read on mssa.app

Key quotes

Most of it is pseudoscience, a lot of wishful thinking.
There is not only no evidence, but also no plausible potential mechanism.
Dr Nick Tiller and I read the paper and were astonished.

From the article

Oxygenated water has been a topic of interest for many years. Most of it is pseudoscience or wishful thinking. There is not only no evidence, but also no plausible mechanism.
Continue reading on mssa.app

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.