All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

C++ vs Python: Performance Benchmark Comparison

4h ago· 1 min readenInsight

Summary

This article presents benchmark comparisons between C++ and Python, focusing on performance metrics across various test programs (fannkuch-redux, nbody, nsieve, spectral-norm). It includes notes on file naming conventions indicating multi-threading, intrinsics usage, and FFI usage, as well as caveats about timing measurements for non-parallelized programs with GC or JIT overhead.

Source

bskyC++ vs Python: Performance Benchmark Comparisonprogramming-language-benchmarks.vercel.app

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
-m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing
-i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage
(You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)
Snippet from the RSS feed
benchmarks,benchmark,performance,fannkuch-redux,helloworld,nbody,nsieve,spectral-norm,C++,C++ lang,Python,Python lang

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.