How universities can assess critical thinking skills in the age of generative AI
By
Kate WilliamsGeorgia Tech’s Center for 21st Century Universities
Summary
The article examines how higher education can increase its relevance and address the impact of generative AI on learning by focusing on improving students' critical thinking skills. It acknowledges that critical thinking is difficult to both teach and measure, often being recognized only in its absence. The piece offers practical ways to level up traditional assessment formats to better evaluate critical thinking in the age of AI.
Source

Key quotes
· 4 pulledImproving critical thinking is neither easy to do nor easy to measure.
Outside educational philosophers, it is often defined as something 'you know when you see it'.
Or, perhaps more clearly, you know it when you don't see it.
This critical time reveals the value of what universities have always been meant to do: improve students' critical thinking.
You might also wanna read

Learning in the age of AI

Generative AI's Impact on Education: Cheating as Symptom of Deeper Problems
The article discusses how generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, is creating significant challenges in education by enabling student cheating.
Critical Assessment: Generative AI's Current Limitations and Unfulfilled Promises
The article presents a critical assessment of generative AI's current state, arguing that large language models (LLMs) cannot be trusted, re
Why Authentic Education Must Go Beyond AI-Generated Content
This commentary argues that authentic education must transcend the mere production of words and content, especially in an era where AI can g

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.