Are Supreme Court Justices Betting On Their Own Cases? A Member Of Congress Would Love John Roberts To Answer This Question
From the article
Prediction markets let anyone with a phone wager on Supreme Court outcomes -- including, theoretically, the people who decide them. A new letter to the Chief Justice asks him to get ahead of the next ethics problem before it becomes a scandal. The post Are Supreme Court Justices Betting On Their Own Cases? A Member Of Congress Would Love John Roberts To Answer This Question appeared first on Above the Law .
Continue reading on Above the LawYou might also wanna read
Judge Emil Bove Set Trump Assassination Photo As His Phone’s Lock Screen, Like A Proper Henchman
Above the Law·12h ago
Supreme Court Narrowly Passes Reading Comprehension Section
Above the Law·13h ago
This Circuit Court Loves Being Wrong
Above the Law·2d ago
The Prosecutor's Office appeals for the withdrawal of Begoña Gómez's and her advisor's passports and charges against Judge Peinado for "conspiring": "Without rigor and without measure"
elconstitucional.es·2h ago
Faroese court procedure law to be updated
dailynorthern.com·2h ago
Nearly 60 years after Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court still debates what counts as reasonable privacy
This article examines the enduring legacy of the 1967 Supreme Court case Katz v. United States, which established the "reasonable expectatio
reason.com·8h ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.