“An unexplained annual spike in false claims on the EA Forum” by Tobias Häberli
3mo agoen
Source
Epistemic status: Very high confidence in the statistical findings. Genuinely confused about the cause. For reasons that will become obvious, I wanted to publish this post on March 31, but unfortunately I could only get it done today. I've been building a classifier to flag potentially misleading content on the EA Forum as part of a side project on epistemics infrastructure. While validating the model, I noticed something I initially assumed was a bug. This is an interim report on that. Summary: Every year, on April 1, the rate of posts containing verifiably untrue claims spikes by roughly 2,200% relative to the annual daily average (p < 0.0001, 8 years of Forum data). 1. The effect is enormous On a typical day, approximately 2 to 4% of Forum posts contain claims that are verifiably false. On April 1, this rises to 57–73%, depending on the year. For context, this is an implausibly large effect by normal social-science standards. I have genuinely never seen anything like it. 2. It repeats every year This is not a one-off event. The pattern recurs in every year of the dataset. 3. "It's only one day" is misleading A natural reaction is that [...] --- Outline: (01:00) 1. The effect is enormous (01:38) 2. It repeats every year (01:57) 3. Its only one day is misleading (02:57) 4. The false posts are high effort (03:21) Possible explanations (03:30) Why this matters (04:48) Proposed interventions --- First published: April 1st, 2026 Source: --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO . --- Images from the article: Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts , or another podcast app.
You might also wanna read
The Rise of Conspiracy Physics and Epistemic Collapse in Academic Science
The article discusses the phenomenon of 'conspiracy physics' where online streamers are building large audiences by attacking academic physi
math.columbia.edu·9mo ago
Introduction to the concept of likelihood and its applications (2018)
journals.sagepub.com·8mo ago
Re: My AI skeptic friends are all nuts
skarlso.github.io·1y ago
The Lancet podcast examines rising retractions and AI's threat to research integrity
This article discusses the alarming rise in retracted scientific papers, which hit 10,000 in 2023 — a tenfold increase over a decade. It exp
Corrected arXiv Submission Data Shows Steady Growth, Not Dramatic Surge in High-Energy Physics Papers
The article presents corrected arXiv preprint submission data showing that while there are year-over-year increases in submissions to the he
math.columbia.edu·4mo ago
Wall Street Sees AI Bubble Coming and Is Betting on What Pops It
bloomberg.com·6mo ago

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.