All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

The Elbit Four case: A legal scholar warns of eroded jury rights and overreach under terrorism laws

By

Geoffrey Robertson

3h ago· 7 min readenOpinion

Summary

Geoffrey Robertson KC argues that the treatment of the "Elbit Four" — pro-Palestine activists who caused criminal damage to an Elbit Systems factory — is a grave miscarriage of justice. He draws a parallel to the historic 1670 Bushell's Case, which established that jurors cannot be punished for their verdicts. Robertson contends that the jurors who found the activists guilty of criminal damage had no idea their verdict would be treated as a verdict on terrorism, leading to severe sentencing under terrorism laws. He calls for public outrage at the legal overreach and the erosion of jury independence.

Source

bskyThe Elbit Four case: A legal scholar warns of eroded jury rights and overreach under terrorism lawstheguardian.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The jurors who found the pro-Palestine activists guilty of criminal damage had no idea their verdict would be treated as a verdict on terrorism
No juror could be punished for their refusal to convict, entitling a jury to decide according to its conscience, whatever the bench directed
You may not sympathise with the Elbit four's methods. But you should be outraged by their treatment under the law
Snippet from the RSS feed
The jurors who found the pro-Palestine activists guilty of criminal damage had no idea their verdict would be treated as a verdict on terrorism, says Geoffrey Robertson KC

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.