Why You Shouldn't Cite AI Language Models as Factual Sources
A response to ‘But ChatGPT said…’
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
AI Chatbots Increasingly Cite Elon Musk's Grokipedia, Raising Accuracy Concerns
Google’s Gemini, AI Mode, and AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft are starting to cite Musk’s Wikipedia knockoff.
The Verge·5mo ago
A Professional Fact-Checker Explains Why AI Is Unreliable for Accurate Information
Can AI do fact-checking? A WIRED fact-checker fact-checks.
wired.com·1mo ago
AI-generated research papers overwhelm academic peer review and citation systems
Journal editors and peer reviewers are being flooded with AI-generated papers that are almost impossible to detect.
The Verge·2mo ago
A Gentle, Non-Technical Introduction to How Large Language Models Like ChatGPT Work
“” is published by Mark Riedl.
mark-riedl.medium.com·1mo ago
Study finds LLMs persist in treating false claims as true despite explicit warnings
Fine-tuning tests show "bias... toward confidently representing the claims as true."
arstechnica.com·1mo ago
Comment: Ignoring and banning AI is the wrong approach — we need honest engagement
AI is annoying – but the typical German approach is wrong again. At the latest now, we have to be honest, says Martin Gerhard Loschwitz.
heise.de·26d ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.