Why Tech Alone Can’t Fix Rural Healthcare
As much as it’s needed, a new $50 billion federal program is too focused on expensive and unsustainable technology that could supplant the basic needs of rural health systems.
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
'Can't treat our way out': Why Australia's $271 billion health spend could miss the mark
A major new report reveals we now live longer, but rising out-of-pocket costs and chronic disease are straining the system.
OPINION: Alaska has a rare opportunity to transform rural health
When people hear that Alaska has been awarded $272 million per year for five years through the Rural Health Transformation Program, one of t
The Rural Health Transformation Fund: One Year Later
One year into the Rural Health Transformation Fund, what's working and what's next? In this conversation, Maya Sandalow, associate director
Why single-payer health systems may struggle with cutting-edge biomedical innovation
That is the theme of my latest Free Press piece, here is one excerpt from it: Government-run systems often (not always) do a perfectly fine

Oregon awards the largest round of federal rural healthcare grants
The Oregon Health Authority has so far awarded $175.3 million in grants from a new federal program meant to support rural healthcare. The Ru

Oregon awards the largest round of federal rural healthcare grants
The Oregon Health Authority has so far awarded $175.3 million in grants from a new federal program meant to support rural healthcare. The Ru

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.