All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why I Don't Enjoy Using Claude Code: Valuing the Coding Process Over Automation

By

ingve

4mo ago· 7 min readenOpinion

Summary

Stephen Brennan reflects on his experience with LLM-based coding assistants like Claude Code, explaining why he doesn't enjoy using them despite their effectiveness. He argues that while these tools are genuinely useful for creating features and projects, he values the coding process itself - the problem-solving, debugging, and learning that comes from writing code manually. Brennan suggests that automating coding removes the intellectual engagement and satisfaction he derives from programming, making him unlikely to ever love such tools even if he uses them pragmatically.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
LLM-based coding agents like Claude Code & Codex are all the rage right now. Rightfully so, because these tools are actually getting good.
I'll likely never love a tool like Claude Code, even if I do use it, because I value the task it automates.
Whenever I use Claude Code, I notice...
I have a lot of feelings that I can't cover in one blog post, but one thing feels like it's becoming clear to me.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Stephen Brennan's personal website and blog.

You might also wanna read