Two Max Planck papers retracted by Springer Nature, likely due to automated bot error
By
Sam Kean Sam Kean is a science journalist in Washington, D.C.
Summary
The article reports on the retraction of two papers by Nobel Prize-winning physicist Max Planck by Springer Nature, likely due to a bot or automated system error rather than actual scientific misconduct. The retractions were discovered by historian Yves Gingras while browsing Retraction Watch. The incident raises questions about the reliability of automated retraction systems and the potential for reputational damage to historical scientific figures when such errors occur.
Source

Key quotes
· 3 pulledThe link was too juicy not to click.
Retractions by Nobel Prize winners
Springer Nature has removed two studies by Max Planck. A bot may be to blame
You might also wanna read
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban

Independent Chinese vlogger exposes scientific misconduct, prompting institutional investigations
Geng Hongwei, a former biomedical Ph.D. student and independent video blogger in China, has gained widespread acclaim for exposing scientifi

French physicist Étienne Klein loses doctorate after plagiarism investigation
French physicist and popular science communicator Étienne Klein has been stripped of his doctorate after a 20-month university investigation

French physicist Étienne Klein loses doctorate after university finds plagiarism in Ph.D. thesis
French physicist and popular science communicator Étienne Klein has been stripped of his doctorate after a 20-month university investigation
Columbia researcher's own paper nearly published with AI-hallucinated reference, highlighting growing academic integrity concern
A Columbia University associate professor, Maxim Topaz, who researches AI applications in healthcare, nearly published a scientific paper co

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.