Why Russia must be part of post-Ukraine war security architecture
Andrey Melnichenko argues that when the war in Ukraine ends, Russia must be included in the new security architecture. He contends that great wars result from accumulated pressures—eroded mutual trust, broken commitments, and the inability to see the other side as part of a shared system—rather than from the first shots fired. The piece advocates for a post-war plan that integrates Moscow into the security framework.
Key quotes
GREAT WARS do not begin where the first shots are fired.
The front line is merely the point where accumulated pressure finally breaks through to the surface.
the language of mutual security, trust in commitments, a shared understanding of what is permissible, the capacity to perceive the other side as part of a common system rather than a threat to be eliminated
You might also wanna read
Why a broken Russia is bad for the world
The Economist·9h ago
Risk Management after Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: Recommendations and Tools for Businesses
B4Ukraine·2y ago
"This is not just a war for territory
Pravda·1d ago
If necessary, the United States will protect Ukraine's airspace after the end of the war, — Trump
Pravda·1d ago
Assessing the Feasibility of a 'Drone Wall' Defense System Against Russian Attacks
The article examines the feasibility and implications of creating a 'drone wall' defense system against Russian drone attacks, using Ukraine
bbc.co.uk·7mo agoWar has degraded Russia’s long-term economic outlook and business environment
Bank of Finland·1y ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.