'Was not provided counsel': Police cannot trick or exploit confusion to make people waive their right to an attorney, Michigan Supreme Court rules
"A police officer cannot directly contradict, out of one side of his mouth, the Miranda warnings just given out of the other," the court said, quoting precedent. The post 'Was not provided counsel'…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
Drawing a line on the implied license doctrine
Supreme Court finds police breached the rights of a suspected impaired driver when they opened the door of his vehicle
Why You Should Never Speak to Police Without a Lawyer: Advice from a Former Prosecutor
Always talk to a criminal defense attorney before you tell the police anything or consent to a search without a warrant. When I was a prosec
campolalaw.com·1mo agoYou have the right to an attorney
You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Anybody who’s seen a TV police drama reco
Michigan Supreme Court Limits Police Phone Searches, Requires Specific Warrants for Digital Devices
The justices drew a bright line through the data stream, declaring that your pocket-sized diary deserves more respect than a rummaged junk d
reclaimthenet.org·10mo agoChatrie and the Court’s Pretzel Logic: The Fourth Amendment Gets Twisted
The Supreme Court just told police they cannot turn your phone into a witness against you merely because you walked through the wrong patch
Forcing Prosecutors To Bring Cases To Keep Their Jobs? What Could Possibly Go Wrong? — See Also
DOJ Has A Cool New Way To Demoralize The Attorneys It Has Left Working For It: Mandatory case quotas. Read The Opinion… No, Not Like That: A
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.