VANISHING ACT: TCPA Defendant Avoids Fees And Sanctions After Its Attorney Disappears
Hi TCPAWorld! In Wilson v. MAH Group, Inc. , No. 6:25-cv-00855-MTK, 2026 WL 1983213 (D. Or. July 8, 2026), the United States District Court for the District of Oregon denied a TCPA plaintiff’s motion…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf]
Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 7 # Comments: 1
“King v. Bon Charge” Marks An Opportunity to Fight Back Against Meritless TCPA “Quiet Hours” Litigation
A federal court has issued a ruling on the ongoing fight over TCPA “quiet hours” litigation — and ecommerce businesses should pay close atte
California Court Fines Attorney $10,000 for ChatGPT-Generated Fake Legal Citations
The court of appeals issued an historic fine after 21 of 23 quotes in the lawyer's opening brief were fake. Courts want more AI regulations.
calmatters.org·9mo ago
Two California lawyers suspended six months for citing fake AI-generated cases in court filing
Two Southern California lawyers were fined $2,500 and suspended them from practice in the court for six months for “gross misrepresentations
sfchronicle.com·1mo ago
Seventh Circuit Weighs Whether a Text Message Is Really a “Call” Under the TCPA
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard oral arguments in Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services as it prepares to weigh
US Court of Appeals: TOS may be updated by email, continued use implies consent [pdf]
Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 5 # Comments: 1
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.