US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf]
Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 7 # Comments: 1
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
Federal Court Rules AI Chatbot Conversations Not Protected by Attorney-Client Privilege
A new federal court ruling makes clear that business owners and executives can't expect confidentiality for legal discussions with AI, as th
forbes.com·1mo ago
Legal Risks of Generative AI: Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protections
Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Harvey, and Microsoft Copilot are increasingly being used to research legal questions, review docu
jdsupra.com·1mo ago
Privilege Waived! Clients Risk Waiving Attorney-Client Privilege When Seeking AI Legal Advice Prior to Meeting with Attorneys
More than ever before, clients are using artificial intelligence (AI) prior to approaching their attorneys for legal advice. Doing so proves
Maybe Section 230 doesn’t shield AI companies from liability, after all
open.substack.com/pub/garymarc...
AI must not be protected by the right to freedom of expression
The question is not just a rhetorical, parlor exercise, but has relevant consequences. This was raised this week by the Columbia Journalist
AI must not be protected by the right to freedom of expression
The question is not just a rhetorical, parlor exercise, but has relevant consequences. This was raised this week by the Columbia Journalist
OpenAI sued by Florida’s attorney general over AI harms
Suit alleging ChatGPT is an unsafe product follows criminal investigation over its role in campus mass shooting. on.wsj.com/4fkcgc8
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.