All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

US Supreme Court Declines to Review AI-Generated Art Copyright Case

By

Emma Roth

3mo ago· 3 min readenNews

Summary

The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case challenging the rule that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, effectively upholding the Copyright Office's position that copyright protection requires human authorship. The case involved computer scientist Stephen Thaler's attempt to copyright an AI-generated image called 'A Recent Entrance to Paradise' on behalf of his algorithm. This decision maintains the current legal framework that excludes purely AI-generated works from copyright protection.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case over whether AI-generated art can obtain a copyright
The Monday decision comes after Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist from Missouri, appealed a court's decision to uphold a ruling that found AI-generated art can't be copyrighted
In 2019, the US Copyright Office rejected Thaler's request to copyright an image, called A Recent Entrance to Paradise, on behalf of an algorithm he created
Snippet from the RSS feed
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case over whether AI-generated art can be copyrighted.

You might also wanna read