All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Understanding Futurelock in Rust Programming: How It Defeats Local Reasoning About Correctness

By

bcantrill

7mo ago· 7 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses 'futurelock' in Rust programming, which is a problem similar to async cancellation that defeats Rust's goal of enabling local reasoning about correctness. Futurelock occurs when combining multiple components that individually seem correct but together create deadlock issues, particularly with Mutexes that might be buried deep in the codebase across different modules or packages. The article explains that there's no single abstraction or programming pattern to avoid, requiring developers to examine multiple layers of the stack simultaneously to identify these issues.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
futurelock defeats Rust's goal of being able to reason locally about correctness
None of these by itself is wrong, but combining them results in futurelock
It could require looking across many layers of the stack at once to be able to see the problem
There's no one abstraction, construct, or programming pattern we can point to here and say 'never do this'
Snippet from the RSS feed
Like async cancellation (see [rfd397]), futurelock defeats Rust’s goal of being able to reason locally about correctness. If we look at the pieces involved in our example:

You might also wanna read