Think preprints are unreliable? Analysis of 70,000 studies might change your mind
Nature, Published online: 10 July 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-02167-3 Central conclusions rarely change when biomedical preprints go on to be published in journals.
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
Study Finds Over 2,800 Biomedical Articles Contained AI-Fabricated Citations
A Lancet correspondence described how over a three-year period, 4,046 references in 2,810 published scientific journal articles had been fab
forbes.com·1mo ago
Preprints Are Now in PubMed
The NIH Preprint Pilot, which aims to expand access to NIH-funded research by increasing the discoverability of preprints, entered its secon
QED — The most compelling preprints of 2025
🎉 Meet The 1%. QED Science evaluated 57,455 @biorxivpreprint life science preprints - blindly, at scale, and on the strength of the science
the-one-percent.qedscience.com·16d ago
Decade-old image duplication concerns remain unaddressed in Elsevier's Cytokine journal
Around 2014-2015, I screened 20,000 biomedical articles for image duplication in 2014-2015. About 4% of those papers, 782 to be exact, conta
scienceintegritydigest.com·15d agoTransparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature's research papers
Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 15 # Comments: 0
In Conversation with Editorial Board Members
Celebrating Peer Review Week 2023’s theme, Peer Review and the Future of Publishing. With the rise of generative AI, preprints, and other ch
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.