The Westlaw and LexisNexis Duopoly: How Two Companies Control Access to American Law
Ever since a spate of mergers in the 1990s, Westlaw and LexisNexis have dominated legal research. And that might be why searching legal cases is so costly, even in the age of AI.
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read

LexisNexis CEO on the Company's Evolution from Legal Database to AI Platform
Sean Fitzpatrick discusses AI tools such as Protégé and how LexisNexis works as an AI platform in addition to a case law database.
Big Law vs. Boutique Firms: Divergent AI Spending Strategies Revealed in Bloomberg Survey
As legal AI adoption becomes more commonplace, about two-thirds of Big Law firms told Bloomberg Law that they spent a minuscule portion of t

Stop Moving Your Legal Data. Start Connecting to It.
Legal organizations are not suffering from a lack of technology. In many cases, they have the opposite problem. Most corporate legal departm
Why traditional law firm pyramids are collapsing under AI, pricing pressure, and talent churn
The troika of artificial intelligence, pricing, and talent transience has been with us for some time now. As a result, traditional pyramid-s
Why traditional law firm pyramids are collapsing under AI, pricing pressure, and talent churn
The troika of artificial intelligence, pricing, and talent transience has been with us for some time now. As a result, traditional pyramid-s
Algorithmic Pricing: Navigating Antitrust and Consumer Protection Risks
Companies increasingly are turning to artificial intelligence-driven pricing tools to optimize pricing strategies, but regulators and courts
The battle to free legal information
ROSS’ antitrust lawsuit argues that Westlaw is maintaining a monopoly by making it impossible to separate what should be publicly accessible

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.