All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The Westlaw and LexisNexis Duopoly: How Two Companies Control Access to American Law

By

toomuchtodo

4mo ago· 21 min readenInsight

Summary

This article examines the Westlaw and LexisNexis duopoly in legal research, arguing that their dominance since the 1990s has led to high costs for legal professionals and limited access to legal information. Written by a federal judicial law clerk and attorney, the piece explores how these two platforms control access to case law, statutes, and legal documents, creating barriers for lawyers, small firms, and the public. It discusses the historical consolidation of the legal research market, the pricing structures that make these services expensive, and how emerging AI technologies might disrupt this duopoly by offering more affordable alternatives for legal research.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The law in America does not belong to lawyers, it belongs to all of us. As citizens, we must be able to read the law, understand it.
Ever since a spate of mergers in the 1990s, Westlaw and LexisNexis have dominated legal research. And that might be why searching legal cases is so costly, even in the age of AI.
I'm excited to be writing a guest piece for BIG, this time on a particular competition problem I (and nearly every lawyer) deals with on a daily basis: the Lexis/Westlaw duopoly.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Ever since a spate of mergers in the 1990s, Westlaw and LexisNexis have dominated legal research. And that might be why searching legal cases is so costly, even in the age of AI.

You might also wanna read