The US Supreme Court refuses to allow the removal of a Federal Reserve Governor, holding that removal “for cause” is judicially reviewable, requires a substantial cause and must be preceded by notice and an opportunity to respond (Trump / Cook)
In Trump v. Cook, No. 25A312, decided on 29 June 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States denied, by a vote of five to four, the President's application to stay a preliminary injunction…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
The US Supreme Court holds that the statutory protection shielding FTC Commissioners from at-will presidential removal is unconstitutional, overrules Humphrey's Executor, and strips independent agencies of insulation from presidential removal power (Trump
concurrences.com·11h ago
The US Supreme Court overrules Humphrey's Executor, holding that the president may remove FTC commissioners at will, while carving out a narrow removal exception for Federal Reserve governors (Trump / Slaughter) (Trump / Cook)
concurrences.com·14h ago
The Indian Government increases the financial thresholds for merger control
concurrences.com·2d ago
EU draft merger guidelines quietly politicize competition law through soft-law instruments
truthonthemarket.com·15d ago
Commission reaches preliminary position that Amazon's and Microsoft's market leading cloud services should be designated under the DMA
cordis.europa.eu·15d ago
Commission approves €76 million German State aid for first-of-a-kind semiconductor testing equipment facility
cordis.europa.eu·16d ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.