The Unintended Effects of Interest Rate Caps: Credit Rationing for Risky Borrowers

In imperial China, 3 percent was the maximum legal monthly loan rate; charging more was punishable by 40 to 100 blows with the “ light cane .” (Rockoff 2003 ) Centuries later, many U.S. states are imposing the same cap (without corporal penalties) on alternative credit providers, such as payday, installment, and auto-title lenders, with the goal of lowering credit costs and delinquency for the high-risk borrowers that rely on these funding sources. A concern, however, is that lenders will simply refuse to lend to these borrowers at lower interest rates. Our recent Staff Report studies how interest rate caps have played out in several states that recently adopted them. Using household-level data from a major credit bureau, we find that loan balances for the riskiest borrowers declined substantially relative to counterparts in states without caps. Despite taking on less debt, these borrowers did not experience an improvement in delinquencies.

The Unintended Effects of Interest Rate Caps: Credit Rationing for Risky Borrowers

Source

You might also wanna read

Education Department cuts student loan interest by 1 point for some borrowers as delinquencies rise

Research suggests pandemic student loan forgiveness may have worsened borrowers' financial outcomes

Education Department to offer larger auto-pay interest rate discount for student loan borrowers starting July 1

Untitled

Private credit faces painful reckoning as cheap capital era ends

Private credit faces painful reckoning as cheap capital era ends

Comments