All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The Resurgence of Lines of Code as a Productivity Metric in the AI Era

By

birdculture

3mo ago· 13 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the resurgence of lines of code (LOC) as a productivity metric in software development, despite decades of consensus that it's a terrible measure. It explores how AI-generated code has made this metric even more problematic, as AI can produce verbose, inefficient code that inflates line counts while potentially reducing quality. The piece examines historical criticism from programming luminaries like Dijkstra, Gates, and Thompson, and analyzes how modern development practices and AI tools have brought back this flawed metric in new, more dangerous forms.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
Dijkstra called it 'a very costly measuring unit because it encourages the writing of insipid code.'
Bill Gates compared measuring programming progress by lines of code to measuring aircraft building progress by weight.
Ken Thompson said one of his most productive days was deleting code.
Lines are spent, not produced.
The metric we killed is back, and AI made it worse
Snippet from the RSS feed
The metric we killed is back, and AI made it worse

You might also wanna read