All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Parametricism cannot become dominant architecture style as capitalism has abandoned the masses, argues Douglas Spencer

By

Douglas Spencer

20d ago· 11 min readenOpinion

Summary

Douglas Spencer argues that parametricism, once proclaimed as the next dominant architectural style after modernism, cannot achieve dominance because the capitalist conditions that originally supported it have fundamentally changed. He contends that contemporary capitalism is no longer invested in the lives of the masses, undermining parametricism's foundational premise. The article critiques Patrik Schumacher's Parametricist Manifesto and explores the shifting relationship between architecture, design, and economic systems.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Parametricism was to be 'the great new style after modernism'.
The relationship between architecture and capitalism on which parametricism was premised ceased to exist long ago.
Parametricism can never become a dominant architecture style now that the forces of capitalism are no longer interested in the lives of the masses.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Parametricism can never become dominant now that capitalism is no longer interested in the lives of the masses, writes Douglas Spencer.

You might also wanna read