All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The Problem with Technical Comparisons: How Writing About 'Foo vs Bar' Can Alienate Your Audience

By

ysangkok

5mo ago· 3 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the pitfalls of writing technical comparisons that alienate parts of the audience, using the example of comparing 'foo' and 'bar' where some readers might know 'bar' as 'frobnicated foo'. It warns that such comparisons can confuse and alienate readers who have different terminology or strong opinions about technical concepts, suggesting writers should be careful with comparative technical writing to avoid excluding knowledgeable audience members.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Try to avoid writing things like this: 'Foo is bad, and bar is better; here is why ...'
Because inevitably, somebody will respond: 'wait, I was confused, but I think I've figured it out: what you're calling a 'bar' I know as a 'frobnicated foo''
A frobnicated foo is obviously a type of foo.
So writing things like that alienates a core part of your audience: the people who have strong opinions on frobni
Snippet from the RSS feed
A rare divergence from our regularly unscheduled computer junk brings you: computer people junk.

You might also wanna read