George Monbiot: UK's £21.7bn carbon capture spending is a wasteful fossil fuel con
George Monbiot argues that the UK government's £21.7bn investment in carbon capture technology is a wasteful, misguided approach to tackling climate change, driven by fossil fuel industry influence rather than effective solutions. He suggests the new prime minister should cancel this spending and redirect funds to better climate strategies.
Key quotes
The new prime minister will be looking for money? Well, here's £21.7bn lying on the ground.
The government could cancel its deranged, disastrous carbon capture
From the article
You might also wanna read
George Monbiot argues UK's £21.7bn carbon capture programme is a wasteful fossil fuel subsidy
George Monbiot argues that the UK government's £21.7 billion carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme is a wasteful, counterproductive sch
theguardian.com·1d agoGeorge Monbiot argues UK's £21.7bn carbon capture programme is a wasteful fossil fuel subsidy
George Monbiot argues that the UK government's £21.7 billion carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme is a wasteful, counterproductive sch
The Guardian·1d agoGeorge Monbiot argues UK's £21.7bn carbon capture programme is a wasteful fossil fuel subsidy
George Monbiot argues that the UK government's £21.7 billion carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme is a wasteful, counterproductive sch
theguardian.com·1d agoGeorge Monbiot argues UK's £21.7bn carbon capture programme is a wasteful fossil fuel subsidy
George Monbiot argues that the UK government's £21.7 billion carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme is a wasteful, counterproductive sch
theguardian.com·1d agoGeorge Monbiot argues UK's £21.7bn carbon capture programme is a wasteful fossil fuel subsidy
George Monbiot argues that the UK government's £21.7 billion carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme is a wasteful, counterproductive sch
The Guardian·1d agoGeorge Monbiot argues UK's £21.7bn carbon capture programme is a wasteful fossil fuel subsidy
George Monbiot argues that the UK government's £21.7 billion carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme is a wasteful, counterproductive sch
The Guardian·1d ago
GB News co-owner ‘cashing in on climate chaos’ after leap in fossil fuel investments, critics say
GB News co-owner ‘cashing in on climate chaos’ after leap in fossil fuel investments, critics say
The magic trick is over: investigation shows carbon capture can't save fossil fuels
Carbon capture and storage is helping fossil fuel companies dump risk onto the public
Governments Are Spending $1.1 Trillion Propping Up the Fossil Fuel Industry While Households Pay the Price
Commentary: Carbon capture research shows limited results after decades of oil industry funding
A brief commentary on a ProPublica piece about the challenges of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. The author notes that oil comp
FlowingData·3d ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.