All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The Disconnect Between Legal Tech Vendors and Lawyer Needs

By

jpbryan

5mo ago· 9 min readenInsight

Summary

The article critiques the disconnect between legal tech vendors and the actual needs of lawyers, arguing that despite massive venture capital investment, new legal AI companies have over-promised and under-delivered. It explores why tech developers struggle to create effective software for the legal profession while excelling at building AI that emulates human intelligence, suggesting a fundamental misunderstanding of legal workflows and requirements.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Lawyers and legal tech procurers often feel that vendors don't 'get it.' They don't understand what lawyers need and they build solutions for problems that lawyers don't have.
A tsunami of venture capital in the space has only amplified this dynamic.
If you've spent time in r/legaltech in recent months, you're surely aware of the shared frustration by both lawyers and legal tech procurers that this new crop of legal AI companies have over-promised and under-delivered.
Why is it easier for tech people to build machines that emulate human intelligence than it is for them to build software for law
Snippet from the RSS feed
And why tech people wont accept it

You might also wanna read