All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The Critical Need for Succession Planning in Open Source Projects

By

edent

6mo ago· 3 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the critical importance of succession planning in open source projects, drawing parallels between historical monarchical succession crises and modern open source leadership transitions. It argues that while open source project maintainers are mortal and will eventually leave their roles (due to death, boredom, lottery wins, illness, conscription, or mental health issues), most projects lack formal succession plans. The piece emphasizes that without proper transition mechanisms, projects risk collapse or becoming 'zombie projects' when maintainers depart, highlighting the need for community governance, documentation, and clear succession protocols to ensure project longevity.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Most of the people who run Open Source projects are mortal. Recent history shows us that they will all eventually die, or get bored, or win the lottery, or get sick, or be conscripted, or lose their mind.
King Whatshisface was a wise and noble ruler who bought peace and prosperity to all the land. Upon his death, his heirs waged bloody war over rightful succession which plunged the country into a hundred years of hardship.
The great selling point of open source is that it's supposed to be resilient to single points of failure. But in practice, most projects are just as vulnerable as any monarchy when it comes to succession.
Without a clear plan for what happens when the maintainer leaves, projects can become zombie projects - technically alive but functionally dead, with no one empowered to make decisions or accept contributions.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Most of the people who run Open Source projects are mortal. Recent history shows us that they will all eventually die, or get bored, or win the lottery, or get sick, or be conscripted, or lose their mind. If you've ever visited a foreign country's natio

You might also wanna read