All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The Case for Using Single Server Architecture Over Distributed Systems

By

antov825

9mo ago· 16 min readenInsight

Summary

The article argues against the trend of distributed systems and microservices, advocating instead for using "one big server" when possible. It critiques the industry's obsession with distributed architecture, highlighting the significant developer time and cost overheads involved. The author suggests that many applications don't actually need distributed systems and that simpler monolithic approaches can be more efficient and cost-effective for most use cases.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
A lot of ink is spent on the "monoliths vs. microservices" debate, but the real issue behind this debate is about whether distributed system architecture is worth the developer time and cost overheads.
By thinking about the real operational considerations of our systems, we can get some insight into whether we actually need distributed systems for most things.
We have all gotten so familiar with virtualization and abstractions between our software and the servers that run it.
These days, "serverless" computing is all the rage, and even "bare metal" is a class of virtual machine.
Snippet from the RSS feed
A lot of ink is spent on the "monoliths vs. microservices" debate, but the real issue behind this debate is about whether distributed system …

You might also wanna read