All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Testing AI Job Interview Platforms: Human Interaction Still Preferred

By

speckx

2mo ago· 2 min readenReview

Summary

The author personally tested three AI-powered job interview platforms for various positions, including roles based on their current job and real openings at Vox Media. While some platforms felt more natural than others, the overall experience was unsatisfactory, with the author consistently wishing they were speaking to a human interviewer instead. The article argues that despite the challenging job market, the drawbacks of AI interviewers significantly outweigh the benefits for job seekers, noting the lack of conversational flow and genuine human interaction.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
I tried out three AI interviewers myself for a range of jobs, either ones created for the exercise based on my current position or real jobs currently listed at Vox Media.
Some of the platforms felt a lot more natural than others, but no matter what, each time I wished I was talking to a human instead.
I realize the job market is tough, but in my opinion, the downsides to these tools far outweigh the benefits for jobseekers.
While they might be presented as a just-the-facts interviewer, there's no flow of conversation, no chance for...
Snippet from the RSS feed
Hayden Field for The Verge: For this video, I tried out three AI interviewers myself for a range of jobs,...

You might also wanna read