All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Technical Discussion: Distributed SQL Engine Requirements for Ultra-Wide Tables in ML and Multi-Omics Data

By

synsqlbythesea

4mo ago· 2 min readenNews

Summary

A technical discussion about the limitations of current SQL databases and data processing systems when handling ultra-wide tables with thousands to tens of thousands of columns, particularly in ML feature engineering and multi-omics data contexts. The author describes practical limitations where standard SQL databases cap at around 1,000-1,600 columns, columnar formats like Parquet require Spark or Python pipelines, and OLAP engines have their own constraints. The post seeks recommendations for distributed SQL engines that can handle such wide tables effectively.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
At some point, the problem stops being 'how many rows' and becomes 'how many columns'. Thousands, then tens of thousands, sometimes more.
Standard SQL databases usually cap out around ~1,000–1,600 columns.
Columnar formats like Parquet can handle width, but typically require Spark or Python pipelines.
OLAP engines are fast, but tend to assume a certain column count range.
Snippet from the RSS feed
I ran into a practical limitation while working on ML feature engineering and multi-omics data.

You might also wanna read