All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why Average LLM Use Is Likely Destroying Value in Software Development

By

Jake

7h ago· 12 min readenInsight

Summary

The author argues that, contrary to prevailing hype, the average use of Large Language Models (LLMs) is likely destroying value rather than creating it. Drawing on data from Faros.ai, a software development telemetry firm that measures operational impacts across tools like Jira and GitHub, the article presents evidence that LLM integration in software workflows may be counterproductive. The piece shifts from a previously neutral stance to a critical position on LLM value creation, suggesting that the technology's current application patterns are net negative for productivity and outcomes.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
On average, how we're using LLMs is likely destroying value.
I'm arguing elsewhere that LLMs will never be geniuses.
This is not part 2 of The Ontology Argument.
Snippet from the RSS feed
What the data says about the operational impacts of LLM use in the software industry

You might also wanna read